Jürgen Braun, PhD

Abstract

The evaluation of PFAS immobilization performance in laboratory experiments, especially the long-term stability, is a challenge. To contribute to the development of adequate experimental procedures, the impact of experimental conditions on the leaching behavior was studied. Three experiments on different scales were compared: batch, saturated column, and variably saturated laboratory lysimeter experiments. The Infinite Sink (IS) test – a batch test with repeated sampling – was applied for PFAS for the first time. Soil from an agricultural field amended with paper-fiber biosolids polluted with various perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs; 655 μg/kg ∑18PFAAs) and polyfluorinated precursors (1.4 mg/kg ∑18precursors) was used as the primary material (N-1). Two types of PFAS immobilization agents were tested: treatment with activated carbon-based additives (soil mixtures: R-1 and R-2), and solidification with cement and bentonite (R-3). In all experiments, a chain-length dependent immobilization efficacy is observed. In R-3, the leaching of short-chain PFAAs was enhanced relative to N-1. In column and lysimeter experiments with R-1 and R-2, delayed breakthrough of short-chain PFAAs (C4) occurred (> 90 days; in column experiments at liquid-to-solid ratio (LS) > 30 L/kg) with similar temporal leaching rates suggesting that leaching in these cases was a kinetically controlled process. Observed differences between column and lysimeter experiments may be attributed to varying saturation conditions. In IS experiments, PFAS desorption from N-1, R-1, and R-2 is higher than in the column experiments (N-1: +44 %; R-1: +280 %; R-2: +162 %), desorption of short-chain PFAS occurred predominantly in the initial phase (< 14 days). Our findings demonstrate that sufficient operating times are essential in percolation experiments, e.g., in column experiments >100 days and LS > 30 L/kg. IS experiments may provide a faster estimate for nonpermanent immobilization. The comparison of experimental data from various experiments is beneficial to evaluate PFAS immobilization and to interpret leaching characteristics.

Abstract

The aim of the study was the comparison of the soil hydraulic properties determined based on two different experimental methods of four large and macroporous soil samples. An undisturbed cylindrical soil column (h = 60 cm and d = 30 cm) was obtained at a natural slope and quartered horizontally in the laboratory. The four sub-samples were saturated and subsequently drained using the extended multi-step outflow method (XMSO). Retention curves and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity curves were derived via inverse modeling based on the measured drainage and corresponding pore water pressure. After resaturation the evaporation method (EVA) was used on the same four samples. The samples were exposed to evaporation and the effective water contents and the average pore water pressures were recorded over time to determine soil hydraulic functions. While both methods yielded similar results in the medium moisture range, the advantage of the XMSO-method is its higher information content with respect to the hydraulic conductivity close to water saturation whereas the advantage of the EVA-method is its fast execution. Moreover, the EVA-method is easier to handle and has significantly lower computational requirements than the XMSO-method. Furthermore, since the four soil samples represent a soil profile in the field, a depth dependent characterizing of the soil profile was possible and showed that the soil properties near saturation are greatly dominated by the ratio of macropores in the sample and that a decrease in the macropore ratio with soil depth was clearly reflected in the hydraulic functions. Keywords: Soil hydraulic properties; Multi-step outflow method; Evaporation method; Hydraulic conductivity; Macropores; Soil sample extraction technique; Soil column; Laboratory experiment