This image shows Reynold Chow

Reynold Chow

M.Sc.

PhD student
Institute for Modelling Hydraulic and Environmental Systems (LS3/SimTech)

Contact

+49 711 685 60122

Business card (VCF)

Pfaffenwaldring 5a
D-70569 Stuttgart
Room: 1.15

  1. 2022

    1. Oladyshkin S, Praditia T, Kröker I, Mohammadi F, Nowak W, Otte S. The Deep Arbitrary Polynomial Chaos Neural Network or how Deep Artificial Neural Networks could benefit from Data-Driven Homogeneous Chaos Theory. Neural Networks. 2022;
  2. 2021

    1. Chow R, Parker B, Steelman C, Thoms A, Nowak W. How do fractures influence hyporheic exchange in sedimentary rock riverbeds? Water Resources Research. 2021;57(7):e2020WR028476.
  3. 2019

    1. Chow R. Modelling Surface Water-Groundwater Exchange: Evaluating Model Uncertainty from the Catchment to Bedform-Scale [Internet] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universität Tübingen; 2019. Available from: https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/89044
    2. Vera-Hofmann G, Haas J, Moreno-Leiva S, Díaz F, Eltrop L. How to plan a full-renewable multi-vector energy system to be resilient? Vol. Solar World Congress. Santiago, Chile; 2019.
    3. Chow R, Hao W, Jeremy B, Jürnjakob D, Wöhling T, Nowak W. Sensitivity of simulated hyporheic exchange to river bathymetry: The Steinlach River Test Site. Groundwater. 2019;57(3):378–91.
    4. Motavita DF, Chow R, Guthke A, Nowak W. The Comprehensive Differential Split-Sample Test: A stress-test for hydrological model robustness under climate variability. Journal of Hydrology. 2019;573:501–15.
    5. Chow R, Jeremy B, Jürnjakob D, Wöhling T, Nowak W. Evaluating subsurface parameterization to simulate hyporheic exchange: The Steinlach River Test Site. Groundwater. 2019;58(7):93–109.
    6. Junne T, Haas J, Wang J, Moreno S, Naegler T, Buchgeister J, et al. Considering Ecological Sustainability in Planning the Future Electricity Supply of Chile – How Much More Does it Cost? In Düsseldorf, Germany: International Renewable Energy Storage (IRES) Conference; 2019.
  4. 2018

    1. Guthke A, Höge M, Nowak W. How model selection and averaging strategies help us improve hydrological models. In: General Assembly 2018, Geophysical Research Abstracts 20: EGU2018-12797, 2018. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU); 2018. (General Assembly 2018, Geophysical Research Abstracts 20: EGU2018-12797, 2018).
    2. Cebulla F, Haas J, Eichman J, Nowak W, Mancarella P. How much Electrical Energy Storage do we need? A synthesis for the U.S., Europe, and Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production [Internet]. 2018 Apr;181:449–59. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618301665
    3. Chow R, Wu H, Bennett J, Dugge J, Wöhling T, Nowak W. Sensitivity of simulated hyporheic exchange residence times to river bathymetry. In: General Assembly 2018, Geophysical Research Abstracts 20: EGU2018-10900, 2018. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU); 2018. (General Assembly 2018, Geophysical Research Abstracts 20: EGU2018-10900, 2018).
    4. Thoms A, Chow R, Steelman C, Nowak W, Parker B. Simulating Hyporheic Exchange in Bedrock Rivers - The Eramosa Bedrock River Field Site. In: Fall Meeting 2018. Washington, D.C., USA: American Geophysical Union (AGU); 2018. (Fall Meeting 2018).
    5. Höge M, Wöhling T, Nowak W. Model Selection: Play-It-Safe vs. No-Risk-No-Fun. In: Integrated Hydrosystem Modelling 2018 Conference: How Complex Should Integrated Models Be? Tübingen, Germany: RTG 1829, DFG; 2018. (Integrated Hydrosystem Modelling 2018 Conference: How Complex Should Integrated Models Be?).
    6. Schäfer-Rodrigues-Silva A, Seitz T, Guthke Anneli, Nowak W. Working with multi-model ensembles - what makes models differ and how can we visualize ensembles? In Tübingen, Germany: Seminar of the Research Training Group “Integrated Hydrosystem Modelling”; 2018.
  5. 2017

    1. Chow R, Bennett J, J. Dugge TW, Nowak W. Evaluating Uncertainty in Estimating Groundwater Residence Time through a River Bend –An Integrated Hydrogeologic Modelling Study. In: General Assembly 2017, Geophysical Research Abstracts 19: EGU2017-1881, 2017. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU); 2017. (General Assembly 2017, Geophysical Research Abstracts 19: EGU2017-1881, 2017).
    2. Rodriguez-Pretelin A, Nowak W. Transient flow conditions change how we should think about WHPA delineation: a joint frequency and probability analysis. In: General Assembly 2017, Geophysical Research Abstracts 19: EGU2017-2660, 2017. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU); 2017. (General Assembly 2017, Geophysical Research Abstracts 19: EGU2017-2660, 2017).
    3. Chow R, Bennet J, Dugge J, Wöhling T, Nowak W. Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty of Hyporheic Exchange Modelling. In: Fall Meeting 2017, Abstract: H22D-06. New Orleans, LA, USA: American Geophysical Union (AGU); 2017. (Fall Meeting 2017, Abstract: H22D-06).
  6. 2016

    1. Chow R, Frind ME, Frind EO, Jones JP, Sousa MR, Rudolph DL, et al. Delineating Baseflow Contribution Areas for Streams – A Model and Methods Comparison. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 195:11–22.
  7. 2015

    1. Bode F, Loschko M, Nowak W. How to Decide? Multi-Objective Early-Warning Monitoring Networks for Water Suppliers. In: General Assembly 2015, Geophysical Research Abstracts 17: EGU2015-9270, 2015. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU); 2015. (General Assembly 2015, Geophysical Research Abstracts 17: EGU2015-9270, 2015).
  8. 2014

    1. Schöniger A, Wöhling T, Nowak W. How to address measurement noise in Bayesian model averaging. In: Fall Meeting 2014, Abstract: H23K-1017. San Francisco, CA, USA: American Geophysical Union (AGU); 2014. (Fall Meeting 2014, Abstract: H23K-1017).
    2. Schöniger A, Wöhling T, Nowak W. How reliable is Bayesian model averaging under noisy data? Statistical assessment and implications for robust model selection. In: General Assembly 2014, Geophysical Research Abstracts 16: EGU2014-2211, 2014. Vienna, Austria: European Geosciences Union (EGU); 2014. (General Assembly 2014, Geophysical Research Abstracts 16: EGU2014-2211, 2014).
    3. Schröder P, Class H, Nowak W. On combination of strict Bayesian principles with model reduction technique or how stochastic model calibration can become feasible for large-scale applications. In: Fall Meeting 2013, Abstract: H24F-02. San Francisco, CA, USA: American Geophysical Union (AGU); 2014. (Fall Meeting 2013, Abstract: H24F-02).
  9. 2012

    1. Chow R. Delineating Base Flow Contribution Areas for Streams: A Model Comparison. 2012.
    2. Enzenhöfer R, Nowak W. Well-head Protection: Time matters? But how much? In Mühlheim an der Ruhr, Germany: NUPUS annual Meeting: Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung; 2012.
  10. 2011

    1. Chow R, Frind EO, Sousa M, Jones JP, Rudolph DL, Molson JW. Delineating Capture Zones for Environmentally Sensitive Features– A Model Comparison. In: Geohydro Conference. Quebec City, Quebec Canada; 2011. (Geohydro Conference).

12/2008 B.Sc. in Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo
05/2012 M.Sc. in Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo
Since 10/2015 Phd Student, Institute for Modelling Hydraulic and Environmental Systems, University of Stuttgart

Stochastic modeling of underground flow and transport processes

To the top of the page